Tank Diversity
Tank Diversity
With this being predominantly Vanilla + , will we see some viability in possible itemization ( possible new tier sets) to make Bear tanks or Prot pally more relevant for tanking? It is in there toolkit and we see some new items in game which add to diversity when levelling etc.
Ish-ne-alo por-ah!
Re: Tank Diversity
i think bear and pally tanks are fine. Um maybe we can improve another tank class to lessen the tank drought?
Re: Tank Diversity
Both are already viable tanks.
Bears are even almost optimal: you can have a bear tank through all the content without problem.
Paladin is not optimal, but can perform through all dungeons and at least half the raids ; so it is viable. It's just sweatier.
Would be more interesting to push through itemization a 4th tank spec, like shaman enhanc. They are not viable today, but for the flexest players of all. Perhaps they are one set away from being viable (not to confuse with optimal).
Bears are even almost optimal: you can have a bear tank through all the content without problem.
Paladin is not optimal, but can perform through all dungeons and at least half the raids ; so it is viable. It's just sweatier.
Would be more interesting to push through itemization a 4th tank spec, like shaman enhanc. They are not viable today, but for the flexest players of all. Perhaps they are one set away from being viable (not to confuse with optimal).
Main: Whitemare
Re: Tank Diversity
Paladins are already overpowered as a hybrid class. They don't need more. If anything, they should get a nerf.
Druid bear tanks have a lot of class utility also and have the highest armor (value). It's debatable whether they are overpowered or not.
Warrior tanks are the only non-hybrid tank and offer no real utility for groups and raids outside of Battle Shout. You can almost view deep prot as a "non-support support" class because it is barely viable solo. They're only upside is that they have the best tanking gear (stats and defense) and cooldowns. Warrior could use some tweaks to shield mechanics and their shouts to make Deep Protection more viable (and to also beat out the fury-prot meta).
Shaman tanks SHOULD be more viable IMO because they have talents and abilities for threat. They should be able to counter Paladins. Either give them plate armor or beef up their abilities to give them better obtainable armor values and better threat management. To me, shamans tanks feel like an unfinished idea by Blizzard.
(my warrior shield suggestions)
viewtopic.php?f=14&t=2051
Druid bear tanks have a lot of class utility also and have the highest armor (value). It's debatable whether they are overpowered or not.
Warrior tanks are the only non-hybrid tank and offer no real utility for groups and raids outside of Battle Shout. You can almost view deep prot as a "non-support support" class because it is barely viable solo. They're only upside is that they have the best tanking gear (stats and defense) and cooldowns. Warrior could use some tweaks to shield mechanics and their shouts to make Deep Protection more viable (and to also beat out the fury-prot meta).
Shaman tanks SHOULD be more viable IMO because they have talents and abilities for threat. They should be able to counter Paladins. Either give them plate armor or beef up their abilities to give them better obtainable armor values and better threat management. To me, shamans tanks feel like an unfinished idea by Blizzard.
(my warrior shield suggestions)
viewtopic.php?f=14&t=2051
Suggestion Threads
[Warrior Tank]
viewtopic.php?f=14&t=2051
viewtopic.php?f=14&t=2152
[Shaman]
viewtopic.php?f=14&t=1984
[Warrior Tank]
viewtopic.php?f=14&t=2051
viewtopic.php?f=14&t=2152
[Shaman]
viewtopic.php?f=14&t=1984
Re: Tank Diversity
Lahire wrote: ↑Sat Oct 16, 2021 9:01 amBoth are already viable tanks.
Bears are even almost optimal: you can have a bear tank through all the content without problem.
Paladin is not optimal, but can perform through all dungeons and at least half the raids ; so it is viable. It's just sweatier.
Would be more interesting to push through itemization a 4th tank spec, like shaman enhanc. They are not viable today, but for the flexest players of all. Perhaps they are one set away from being viable (not to confuse with optimal).
um shaman tank is viable. I believe you intended to say make them better or more-viable through an item set.
Re: Tank Diversity
Shaman tank isn't viable in raids, only in dungeon.
You really need to be the chaddest of chads to perform as shaman tank in raid, so I don't think it can be called "viable" (as this term supposes that it is possible to perform as this role for a good portion of players, init?). It's far harder than pal or teddy tanks (near impossible from BWL onwards).
You really need to be the chaddest of chads to perform as shaman tank in raid, so I don't think it can be called "viable" (as this term supposes that it is possible to perform as this role for a good portion of players, init?). It's far harder than pal or teddy tanks (near impossible from BWL onwards).
Main: Whitemare
Re: Tank Diversity
Problem is I've yet to see a shaman tank able to be a hateful strike soaker in vanilla, I'm sure it's possible with world buffs but not without. I've seen paladins do it however, just barely.
Resident Paladin Expert
Re: Tank Diversity
Druid tanks with mcp and bis gear actually have the highest threat of a non-thunderfury tank in the game.Rytz wrote: ↑Sat Oct 16, 2021 5:46 pmPaladins are already overpowered as a hybrid class. They don't need more. If anything, they should get a nerf.
Druid bear tanks have a lot of class utility also and have the highest armor (value). It's debatable whether they are overpowered or not.
Warrior tanks are the only non-hybrid tank and offer no real utility for groups and raids outside of Battle Shout. You can almost view deep prot as a "non-support support" class because it is barely viable solo. They're only upside is that they have the best tanking gear (stats and defense) and cooldowns. Warrior could use some tweaks to shield mechanics and their shouts to make Deep Protection more viable (and to also beat out the fury-prot meta).
Shaman tanks SHOULD be more viable IMO because they have talents and abilities for threat. They should be able to counter Paladins. Either give them plate armor or beef up their abilities to give them better obtainable armor values and better threat management. To me, shamans tanks feel like an unfinished idea by Blizzard.
(my warrior shield suggestions)
viewtopic.php?f=14&t=2051
Resident Paladin Expert
Re: Tank Diversity
I can't really comment because I don't have extensive knowledge of bear tanks. I don't doubt it, though.
Generally speaking, hybrid classes should not be "best" at anything. Including tanking. Warrior is not a hybrid class and offers essentially no utility for groups and raids. Therefore, in my opinion, protection warriors should be the best tanks because it's a very singular role. I plan on writing another suggestion thread on how to improve warrior AoE threat.
Suggestion Threads
[Warrior Tank]
viewtopic.php?f=14&t=2051
viewtopic.php?f=14&t=2152
[Shaman]
viewtopic.php?f=14&t=1984
[Warrior Tank]
viewtopic.php?f=14&t=2051
viewtopic.php?f=14&t=2152
[Shaman]
viewtopic.php?f=14&t=1984
Re: Tank Diversity
I agree that Pally and Bear tanks are viable , but it is there gearing , items sets are aimed at healing so as we progress in raids it is really a Warrior that has a set aimed at tanking. Would it be game breaking or OP if we seen some sets aimed at a Bear or Protadin ? I mean the good thing with a tier set is you need to be consistent and keep that grind to obtain it all.
Ish-ne-alo por-ah!
Re: Tank Diversity
Indeed! you are correct, it starts to get very hard to tank Naxx bosses, hence why Naxx is not advised for casual shaman tank players. In order to legitimately tank Naxx bosses, you will need to know your stuff.
As to why some people think they can't go past BWL is beyond me...
Lahire wrote: ↑Sat Oct 16, 2021 6:45 pmShaman tank isn't viable in raids, only in dungeon.
You really need to be the chaddest of chads to perform as shaman tank in raid, so I don't think it can be called "viable" (as this term supposes that it is possible to perform as this role for a good portion of players, init?). It's far harder than pal or teddy tanks (near impossible from BWL onwards).
Last edited by Yutilk on Mon Oct 18, 2021 8:19 am, edited 1 time in total.
Re: Tank Diversity
It wouldn't but some people would object to it being vanilla if things made senseMythox wrote: ↑Sat Oct 16, 2021 11:47 pmI agree that Pally and Bear tanks are viable , but it is there gearing , items sets are aimed at healing so as we progress in raids it is really a Warrior that has a set aimed at tanking. Would it be game breaking or OP if we seen some sets aimed at a Bear or Protadin ? I mean the good thing with a tier set is you need to be consistent and keep that grind to obtain it all.
Resident Paladin Expert
Re: Tank Diversity
Warrior should be the best but not the only tank option, which is basically the scenario here, or we wouldn't be having this forum discussion.Rytz wrote: ↑Sat Oct 16, 2021 10:47 pmI can't really comment because I don't have extensive knowledge of bear tanks. I don't doubt it, though.
Generally speaking, hybrid classes should not be "best" at anything. Including tanking. Warrior is not a hybrid class and offers essentially no utility for groups and raids. Therefore, in my opinion, protection warriors should be the best tanks because it's a very singular role. I plan on writing another suggestion thread on how to improve warrior AoE threat.
Resident Paladin Expert
Re: Tank Diversity
The only hybrid tank that needs a boost or gear changes is Shaman. Paladin and bear are fine as hybrid tanks. Either warrior is the best or it's not.
Last edited by Rytz on Mon Oct 18, 2021 12:41 am, edited 1 time in total.
Suggestion Threads
[Warrior Tank]
viewtopic.php?f=14&t=2051
viewtopic.php?f=14&t=2152
[Shaman]
viewtopic.php?f=14&t=1984
[Warrior Tank]
viewtopic.php?f=14&t=2051
viewtopic.php?f=14&t=2152
[Shaman]
viewtopic.php?f=14&t=1984
Re: Tank Diversity
Warrior isn't the "only tank option", bear and pala are perfectly viable.
Main: Whitemare
Re: Tank Diversity
Wartank is the best for 99% of encounters.
Beartank is viable for everything and the best for 1% of encounters.
Palatank is never the best, not viable for some encounters, but viable for others.
Shamantank isn't viable for any 40-raid. No guild will ever seek for a shamantank.
Beartank is viable for everything and the best for 1% of encounters.
Palatank is never the best, not viable for some encounters, but viable for others.
Shamantank isn't viable for any 40-raid. No guild will ever seek for a shamantank.
I always follow those rules for suggestion :
1) Does it answer the class/spec problem ?
2) Does it keep the class identity ?
3) Does it keep the vanilla gameplay of the class/spec ?
4) Is it balanced (not OP) ?
1) Does it answer the class/spec problem ?
2) Does it keep the class identity ?
3) Does it keep the vanilla gameplay of the class/spec ?
4) Is it balanced (not OP) ?
Re: Tank Diversity
I have to agree, for me a viable tank means that you don't need to replace that person for a fight. And this is unfortunately the case for shamans and paladins due to lack of a taunt.
Resident Paladin Expert
Re: Tank Diversity
That is why I like the class design of BC the best because it makes all roles viable but you would take specialists over generalists most of the time while generalists were still able to take on most of the challenges.Rytz wrote: ↑Sat Oct 16, 2021 10:47 pmI can't really comment because I don't have extensive knowledge of bear tanks. I don't doubt it, though.
Generally speaking, hybrid classes should not be "best" at anything. Including tanking. Warrior is not a hybrid class and offers essentially no utility for groups and raids. Therefore, in my opinion, protection warriors should be the best tanks because it's a very singular role. I plan on writing another suggestion thread on how to improve warrior AoE threat.
Paladins were great at trash tanking and off tanking at certain bosses and bears were mainly brought to soak cleave. Both were great for 5-Mans while neither was chosen over the warrior in most instances (except Paladin for Karazhan and Shattered Halls).
You took shadows with you as mana battery and damage push for casters and foremost your warlocks. You had shamans buff either melee or magic.
Still they were largely confined to healing or support but they had options.
Since altering the class systems for vanilla is largely a no go itemization could allow a similar approach while enshrining hybrid tax without it being hybrid punishment (viablity is not balance or jack of all trades but fun instead of frustration). The goal is enjoyment for all players not that people are punished for playing classes they like the way they like.
- Augustfenix85
- Posts: 84
Re: Tank Diversity
More Shaman tank gear please. Calmore need a new goal for gear. I’m missing a few things, mainly due to me not having a lot of time lately but it would be a big draw for me. Maybe even a better totem item slot for tanking would be good.
Duvall 60 Hunter
Velissa 35 Priest
Calmore 60 Shaman Tank
Malcore 45 Warlock
Splodax 28 Rogue
Ghostbc 40 Paladin
Hanami 60 Druid
Reidobosu 34 Warrior
Velissa 35 Priest
Calmore 60 Shaman Tank
Malcore 45 Warlock
Splodax 28 Rogue
Ghostbc 40 Paladin
Hanami 60 Druid
Reidobosu 34 Warrior